Source : http://shaolin.org.au/
This article is from the Beijing Review, vol. 49, no. 21, May 25, 2006 (pp44-45).
Shaolin Temple, synonymous with kungfu and Buddhism in China, is making mega media headlines with the recent of its plan to host an international TV kungfu competition. Partnered with a local television station, the grand showdown is set to offer martial arts practitioners from across the globe a chance to become the next Jackie Chan or Bruce Lee.
The first round of competition began in May in Shenzhen, Beijing, Zhengzhou, Shenyang, Chengdu and Shanghai and in the United States, Germany, Russia, Italy and Australia. The finalists have the opportunity to sign contracts with the Shaolin Temple’s acting agency and land a role in new movies and TV dramas about Shaolin. The competition committee secretary-general Fu Min estimates that, during the six month-long competition, as many as 20,000 kungfu enthusiasts will take part in the first round. As the organisers are looking for actors to be the next generation of international stars, contestants are required not only to be skilled, but also have the charm and good looks to sizzle on the silver screen.
Established on Chan philosophy and famous for its martial arts, Shaolin Temple is being publicly questioned and criticised by many for taking something considered sacred into the world of entertainment. They claim that Shaolin Temple has deviated from its core disciplines of meditation and spirituality. If the trend continues, say detractors, the temple’s function will become nothing more than an ego-driven operation for movie production.
According to historical records, Shaolin Temple was built in the late fifth century at the behest of the emperor of the time, to accommodate an Indian monk who came to China for missionary work. The monastery was built in Shaoshishan Mountain’s lush woods, in central Henan Province. The name Shaolin Temple was derived from the Chinese character ‘lin’ meaning ‘woods’. In the year 527, another Indian master, Damo, arrived at the Temple, where he meditated for nine years and created the Chan philosophy and Shaolin martial arts. Since then, Shaolin has become world-renowned for its kungfu.
Its golden years were between the 13th and 17th centuries. Since the beginning of the 18th century, Shaolin had been forgotten until a movie changed its fortunes. In the early 1980’s, the temple had only 12 monks and one hectare of farmland, a sharp contrast with the hundreds of hectares of farmland and more than 2,000 monks in its heyday. A 1982 movie Shaolin Temple became a blockbuster soon after hitting the screen, turning the temple into a household name overnight.
It began to open to the public in September 1974 and by the end of 1978 it had received a total of only 200,000 tourists. In 1982 alone, however, tourist numbers surged to over 700,000 and climbed to a record high of 2.6 million in 1984. Even today, around 1.5 million tourists are attracted to Shaolin Temple every year to look for the traces of the movie settings there.
Besides tourists, martial arts fanatics, mainly youngsters, come to the temple from every corner of the country. Their demand was soon met by martial arts academies, which sprang up adjacent to the temple. Dengfeng City, where the temple is located, has nearly 70 kungfu schools, of which the largest has 15,000 students. The local economy has been greatly boosted by tourism and the martial arts academies.
It is the first time in its 1500-year history that the temple is so closely combined with commercial interests. The bustling business of souvenir stores, restaurants and kungfu academies seems to have submerged the core disciplines of meditation and spirituality.
The commercialization path is now deeply embedded. Shaolin Temple now has its own welfare foundation, magazine, movie and TV company and martial arts promotion agency.
Moreover, Shi Yongxin, the present abbot of Shaolin, travels around the world in a jeep with a chauffeur and goes abroad frequently to socialise with Hollywood celebrities. In the process he has earned he has earned the nickname in the media of the ‘CEO in a cassock’.
Confronted with queries about the commercialisation of Shaolin Temple, Shi, the first Chinese monk with an MBA degree, said; “Our focus is not on increasing the revenue, since that from the tickets is enough to sustain the expenses of the monks. We expect to preach Buddhism far and wide.”
She also explained that against the globalisation backdrop, Shaolin Temple is expected to respond to the economic and cultural dominance of the Western world. Otherwise, Shaolin would not be able to maintain its social influence, which would fall short of the expectations of Shaolin’s ancestry, he said. Since Shaolin was born and has grown through international cultural exchange, it is aimed at becoming the global centre of the Chinese Chan Buddhist sect and a venue of international communication, said Shi.
Shaolin embraces market economy
Qi Jiashan (columnist at China Youth Daily): Shaolin Temple is no longer the same temple in an inaccessible mountain. Instead, it has been developed and promoted as a tourist resort and even its name Shaolin has been commercialised.
The movie and TV drama production company under Shaolin Temple is to produce future kungfu movie stars while another company is engaged in promoting vegetarian cakes and tea under the brand name of Shaolin. A ridiculous on-line game called Shaolin Legend has been developed, which market observers said is all about tapping the huge market potential of online games and nothing about promoting Shaolin culture.
It seems the temple has become the cash cow of the local government and is firmly entrenched in the market economy. I have heard that Shaolin has applied to be on the world heritage list of UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation), and my concern is when that day comes, all that is left will be the body of an ancient temple without its glorious spirit.
While Shaolin tries to catch up with modernisation, it is losing its distinctive nature. There is no peaceful place for Buddha in the Temple shrouded by the chaotic martial arts teachings, vendor stalls and entrepreneurship. Instead of a spiritual paradise, the temple is becoming a money-making machine manipulated by some people. The recent trip to Shaolin by Russian President Vladimir Putin has thrust it under the spotlight. An interesting detail is that the abbot, Shi Yongxin, shook hands with Putin instead of traditionally greeting with palms together, something his critics were quick to pounce on.
Even if the earthly evolution of Buddhism is to some extent acceptable, associating Buddhism with entertainment is rather intolerable. As we know, “Super Girl” is a pure entertainment venture. If people create a “Super Monk” by imitating “Super Girl”, it would have nothing to do with preaching Buddhism.
The commercial tapping of the Shaolin brand has become excessive. What will happen when all the components of Shaolin, including its martial arts, teaching, kungfu books, food and medicine, are developed and consumed?
Chen Ming (associate researcher at the Institute of World Religions, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences):
Influenced by the social environment, the purity of Chinese temples has now become part of the marketing strategy of local governments to promote their economy.
I suppose mind cultivation should be the focus of Buddhist temples, particularly Shaolin Temple, an ancient Buddhist shrine. A person should not sacrifice the essentials for economic interests.
Moreover it seems improper for Shaolin Temple to engage in too many commercial activities and operations.
Chinese society now does need the influence of Buddhism, but what can temples like Shaolin provide us today? I feel Chinese religious culture faces an awkward situation in its current trend of development.
Commercialization beneficial
Yao Weiqun (philosophy professor at Peking University and Buddhism expert):
Since a large number of temples are located in downtown areas, they are hardly cut off from modern society. But viewing the issue from a different perspective, Shaolin monks can make contributions to charitable causes by donating income from their performance tours to natural disaster relief or to poor school dropouts, which is consistent with Buddhist philosophy.
What needs to be remembered is that martial arts are after all not the core value of Buddhism. Only by combining the essence of Buddhist culture with philosophical thought and Chan wisdom can Buddhism be widely disseminated around the world.
Wang Zhiyuan (researcher at the Institute of World Religions, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences):
I have known Shi Yongxin for seven or eight years. He has been devoting great effort to the development of Shaolin Temple.
The affinity between temples and modern society is somewhat unavoidable. The vitality of religions in Hong Kong and Taiwan comes from its combination with the earthly world. Certainly, the combination must follow a principle – the essential emphasis on meditation and spirituality of a religion can never be neglected.
Shi Yongxin is not an exception since great monks are always social activists. They have greater responsibility to shoulder. Anyway, Buddhist doctrines cannot be totally alleviated from earthly virtues. Asceticism and self-isolation of emotions advocated before were due to the limitation of conditions.
Shi Yongxin is wise enough to balance his practical and spiritual life and is an excellent organiser. As an old friend I would urge him to spend more time meditating and practising martial arts and looking after his health, as he appears to have put on a lot of weight in recent years.
Liao Baoping (columnist at Guangming Daily):
Generally, people have the conventional views that monks should always be a sanctuary of purity in an otherwise materialistic world. Therefore, it is unacceptable to many people that Shaolin Temple is polluted by money, commercial activities and entertainment. However, in my view, these comments are to outdated to be true.
Buddhism is essentially a type of culture. Culture evolves with multiple factors of modernity, so has Buddhism. Monks are not gods. They are humans with flesh and blood. The global TV competition for selecting new kungfu stars is essentially about the commercialisation of a culture in a globalized world.
It was not until the late 1990’s that the cultural industry became a recognised economic sector in China. While the cultural industry yields a handsome share of GDP, there is still a fierce debate going on over the viability of the industrialisation of culture.
The real focus of the problem behind Shaolin’s kungfu contest is, in fact, whether Shaolin culture should be commercialised.
If the answer is no, then as Shi Yongxin mentioned, the income from tickets is sufficient to meet the expenses, and monks can wholeheartedly devote themselves to routine work. But in that scenario, Shaolin would not be able to sustain its social influence. If the answer is yes, probably sooner or later the temple will lose its basic function of helping to enlighten others.
Personally I suppose that Shaolin Temple’s culture should be carried forward and some elements of the culture, like martial arts, can be industrialised, while some, like Chan-sect philosophy, should not be commercialised. Shaolin Temple should therefore differentiate elements of its culture in its commercialisation efforts.
secularcitizen Divine affairs